Přidat EnviWeb k oblíbeným odkazům
RSS kanályMobilní verze EnviWeb.cz

Biodiversity benefits of organic farming could depend on context

18.10.2010  |  27× přečteno      vytisknout článek 

Biodiversity benefits of organic farming could depend on context

Organic farming has often been found to have benefits for biodiversity, but the benefits can depend on the individual species and landscape in question. Research on vine farming in Italy suggests that the impact of organic methods on the number or diversity of pollinating insects may depend on local context. For example, the lack of connectivity between organic vine farms may limit benefits in some circumstances.

The negative impacts of pesticides on biodiversity have been partly responsible for an increase in organic farming. Between 1998 and 2007 the proportion of EU-15 agricultural land that is farmed organically increased from 1.8 to 4.1 per cent.

The study, supported by the EU's ALARM and COCONUT projects1, investigated the biodiversity benefits on organic sites that are found in an otherwise conventionally farmed landscape. Pollinating insects are a good indicator of biodiversity and are vulnerable to the effects of pesticides, so the researchers compared the number and range of pollinating insects between six organic vine fields and six conventionally farmed vine fields that used pesticides in North-east Italy. They also looked at the level of pollination on petunia flowers planted in the fields especially for the experiment to measure pollinator activity. Vines are wind-pollinated, so the crops themselves would not provide a good indicator of pollination services.

The majority of pollinating insects were bees. Although both the average number and the range of species were greater in organic fields (an average of 20 bees compared with 13 bees in non-organic fields), the data varied a great deal between the fields which meant that the difference was not significant and could have been due to chance.

The type of farming appeared to have no effect on the number of times the bees visited the vine fields. However, the level of pollination tended to decrease in both types of field when there was a greater proportion of uncultivated land surrounding the fields. It was suggested that the negative impact of the amount of uncultivated land surrounding the fields on pollination could be due to the presence of a wide range of plant species that are attractive to bees on the uncultivated land. This suggests that the quality of unfarmed land surrounding the area, in terms of the plants that grow there and their influence on pollinating insects, is important in maximizing the benefits of organic farming.

The results indicated that, in this case study, there was no clear evidence to suggest that organic farming significantly affected the number and range of pollinating insects and the differences between organic and traditionally farmed vines could have been by chance. It has been suggested that organic farming can benefit pollinating insects when it occurs at a larger scale and it could be that the small and scattered nature of the organic vine fields considered in this study limited any benefit to the pollinators. The researchers also suggested that the biodiversity benefits of organic farming may be crop specific.

The research suggests that the size of the organic managed field, crop type, connectivity of fields and the nature of surrounding land could influence the positive effects of organic farming. If this is the case, specific farmland and crops could be targeted for organic schemes in order to bring the greatest biodiversity benefits. However, these conclusions are very tentative since the research only demonstrates the absence of a difference between the types of vine-farming. When evaluating organic farming it must also be remembered that organic methods have positive effects on the environment other than those on pollinators, such as on the soil and soil organisms.

  1. ALARM (Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods) and COCONUT (Understanding effects of land use change on ecosystems) were both supported by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme. See: www.alarmproject.net and www.coconut-project.net
Source: Brittain, C., Bommarco, R., Vighi, M. et al. (2010).Organic farming in isolated landscapes does not benefit flower-visiting insects and pollination. Biological Conservation. 143:1860-1867.

Contact: claire.brittain@uni.leuphana.de


Související články


Poslední diskuse k článku - 0 příspěvků celkem

přidej nový příspěvek

Zatím žádný příspěvek
můžete na tento článek reagovat jako první...


EnviWeb s.r.o. neručí a nenese zodpovědnost za obsah diskusních příspěvků, diskuse nemoderuje ani nerediguje. Diskusní příspěvky vyjadřují názor jejich autorů. EnviWeb s.r.o. si vyhrazuje právo odstraňovat diskusní příspěvky, a to zejména takové, které odporují dobrým mravům, porušují platné zákony ČR, poškozují dobré jméno serveru nebo obsahují neplacenou reklamu. Diskuse NEJSOU určeny pro dotazy na autory článků nebo redaktory EnviWebu.



Search
ZmapujTo.cz
Fandíme EnviWebu
Výrobky a služby pro životní prostředí
Výrobky a služby pro životní prostředí
Partnerské časopisy
<< Předchozí Následující >>



Doporučujeme: Ekologove.cz - ekologie v každodenní praxi, EnviMarket.cz - nabídka výrobků a služeb, ZmapujTo.cz - hlášení podnětů od občanů, Nazeleno.cz - úspory energie, Inspirace v bydlení, Cena elektřiny, Dřevěné brikety, Palivové dřevo, Palivové dřevo, Palivové dřevo, Palivové dřevo, Palivové dřevo, Palivové dřevo


Enviweb s.r.o. využívá zpravodajství ČTK, jehož obsah je chráněn autorským zákonem.
Přepis, šíření či další zpřístupňování tohoto obsahu či jeho části veřejnosti,a to jakýmkoliv způsobem, je bez předchozího souhlasu ČTK výslovně zakázáno.
Copyright (2008) The Associated Press (AP) - všechna práva vyhrazena. Materiály agentury AP nesmí být dále publikovány, vysílány, přepisovány nebo redistribuovány.
Toplist