The nature march had a huge turnout - so why didn't it make bigger news? | Zoe Williams

Disruptive demonstrations are decried by the press, but given acres of coverage. This is the new conundrum of public protest: the only way to be talked about is if you're demonisedWhen Just Stop Oil covered Stonehenge with orange cornflour last week, Keir Starmer was called upon to decry the act, which he dutifully did, even though anyone with even a very slight knowledge of geology will know that the marks won't last. But that wasn't what the Labour leader was being asked. Rather, the question was whose side was he on, between "respectable" people and disruptive ones?A respectable person, who cares about the environment - and this, in theory, is all respectable people, because to not care about the survival of everything you love would make you unhinged - shouldn't throw things in protest, they should peacefully march. Happily, they did: 100,000 of them at the weekend, fighting for nature. It made some news reports; it didn't make the bulletins. No radio host gave over their phone-in to the question of whether or not this sort of thing should be allowed. This is the new conundrum of public protest; the only way to be talked about is if you're demonised. Grab yourself a "hate march" moniker because one person got arrested, and you'll get all the coverage of your wildest dreams, but it will be unjust, because that one person was actually a counter-protester, and there are more arrests at your average football match. Continue reading...